I got up Thursday morning intending to hit to OA meeting and then meet a San Diegan for breakfast, but neither came to pass.
For reasons I never quite uncovered, I decided upon waking to attend a session on what OA can do for or about youth obesity. Though I definitely learned my obesity in youth, and once or twice even attended a youth-focus meeting in Burlington that has long since folded, I’ve never paid much attention to the plight of kids as a class of overeaters. Still, I went.
Trustee Joe L. (All the trustees used their full names, but in this venue, which falls under “other public media of communication,” I’ve been erring on the side of anonymity) gave a pretty good rundown of efforts that have been expended, and ideas groups might try, but I have to say that I left thinking that there really isn’t much we can do for obese kids.
One reason is the potential for liability. A kid comes to a meeting and starts getting guidance from older strangers? Starts being guided to a Higher Power? Is told to call said strangers — especially one in particular — every day?
A second reason, which didn’t come up during the meeting but is true for me, also relates to HP. I cannot imagine having considered, never mind having embarked on, or having benefited from, a spiritual program of any sort when I was, say, 15, by which time I was already well over 200 pounds. And I had had eight years of religious training, and was recognized one year for missing neither a thrice-weekly class or a Saturday service, so I was exposed to the concepts.
Having said that, here are some of the facts and ideas Joe shared:
* Out of the thousands of meetings registered (my notes say 5,900 one place, 6,400 in another), 11 have a youth focus. And, Joe said, there are actually fewer; a handful had closed when he checked further. Joe suggested that eac intergroups could each try to get one meeting to become more teen-focused, which would have a big effect on the number of teen meetings across the country/world.
* One idea is to have concurrent meetings, similar to a newcomers meeting, so that members get a meeting even if no youths show up.
* Another is to have a teen-option format, to be used if a youth shows up. A meeting could vote to follow the teen format for, say, a few weeks, as long as the teen was coming back. Sharing under such a format might focus on child-eating memories, or the format might ask for sharing to be “teen appropriate.”
* Ask a parent of the teen to attend the meetings with her/his child. Not only would the parent learn a few things, but it would also address most of the liability issues.
* Region conventions could put youth outreach on its agenda, to try to stir up ideas among the fellowship.
* We could do outreach within OA, to try to learn from kids we know (family members, mostly) what might work for their peers.
* On Long Island, they’ve done an “adopt-a-school” effort in which OA members speak to health classes during the addiction portion of the curriculum.
* Telephone meetings might be a good inroad for reaching kids, since logistics such as getting rides can be a bar to a kid’s regular attendance. Online meetings, however, are less good, on child-safety grounds.
This has all been about outreach toward teens, but as is the case throughout recovery, we have a stake in the issues too. Though I have no figures, OA appears to me to skew older, and unless we bring in younger people, we will eventually fade away.
Ask newspapers how the demographics are working for them: Older readers pass away, younger readers go elsewhere, and an industry is in crisis.